Skip to main content
Download PDF

The association between Helicobacter pylori and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of case–control studies

Clinical Diabetes and Endocrinology volume 7, Article number: 15 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Introduction

The relationship between H. pylori infection and obesity development has remained controversial among various studies. The aim of this study was to clarify the pooled effect of H. pylori infection on the development of obesity and vice versa.

Methods

We searched international databases including Medline (PubMed), Web of sciences, Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane, Ovid, and CINHAL to retrieve all case–control studies reporting the effect of H. pylori on obesity and vice versa, which had been published in English between January 1990 and June 2019. The quality of included studies was assessed by the Modified Newcastle–Ottawa Scale for Case–Control studies. The logarithm of the odds ratio (OR) and its standard error was used for the meta-analysis.

Results

Eight case–control studies with 25,519 participants were included for qualitative and quantitative analyses. The pooled analysis showed that obese participants had a higher risk of H. pylori infection than lean participants with an odds ratio of 1.46 (95%CI: 1.26, 1.68). Also, the pooled analysis revealed that participants infected by H. pylori had a higher risk of obesity than non-infected participants with an odds ratio of 1.01 (95%CI: 1.01, 1.02).

Conclusion

The results of this meta-analysis showed that there was a positive correlation between the risk of H. pylori infection and the prevalence of obesity development. Thus, H. pylori positive patients were more likely to be obese, and obese individuals had higher risks of H. pylori infection.

Introduction

Obesity as a chronic non-communicable disease has become a significant public health concern around the world, which can result in or exacerbate a high burden of health conditions like hypertension, hyperlipidemia, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney diseases, fatty liver diseases, etc. Besides, its prevalence has increased during recent years, probably due to modern lifestyles, less physical activity, high-calorie intake, and so on [1,2,3,4]. Recently, animal and human studies revealed that gut microbiota could balance the energy hemostasis of the host and subsequently influence the development of obesity [5, 6]. In a retrospective study on the Chinese population, the results showed that the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in obese people was higher than that in non-obese people, but the results were not statistically significant [7]. In a meta-analysis of the Chinese population, the results showed that people with Helicobacter pylori infection had an odds ratio of 1.20 times higher than those without infection [8]. Also, a meta-analysis study conducted to determine the exact prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection, showed that the prevalence of this infection in the world was 44.3%, which was higher in men than women [9].

In this subject, the correlation between obesity and Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) has been evaluated in many studies [10,11,12]. H. pylori is a spiral-shaped, non-spore-forming and gram-negative bacterium residing on the epithelium of the human stomach. It has been reported that 4.4 billion people around the world were infected with this pathogen in 2015, who approximately included the half of the world [9]. This kind of bacteria affects human health through developing various diseases, e.g. peptic ulcer diseases, gastric cancer, and mucosa-associated lymphoma [13,14,15]. However, the relationship between H. pylori infection and obesity development has been controversial between various studies [10,11,12, 16, 17]. So far, various studies have been done, both as a case study and as a cohort, to investigate the relationship between the presence of Helicobacter pylori infection and the occurrence of obesity or vice versa, but contradictory results of these studies have been published. Some studies showed that people with Helicobacter pylori infection had a higher body mass index than people without infection. An Israeli study found that people with Helicobacter pylori infection were more obese than healthy people while another study found no link between infection and the occurrence of obesity [18]. Lender N et al. also found in a review study that there was no association between obesity and the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection. In a study on 3,578 people aged 16 to 64 years, the results showed that the presence of Helicobacter pylori infection increased the metabolic syndrome incidence in patients so that the risk was higher in women than men [14, 19, 20]. According to the statements above, no meta-analysis study has been performed in the world to determine the association between Helicobacter pylori infection and obesity or vice versa. Conducting such a study, in addition to achieving the appropriate effect size to find a causal relationship, can provide suitable information to health policy makers and clinicians to take appropriate preventive measures and timely treatment. Therefore, the current meta-analysis aimed to clarify the pooled effect of H. pylori infection on the development of obesity and vice versa.

Methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis were in accordance with the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) for reviews of analytical observational studies (case–control) [21,22,23].

Search strategy and screening

We searched Medline (PubMed), Web of sciences, Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane, Ovid, and CINHAL for original articles published in English from January 1990 to December 2019. We used the following index terms and keywords: “Helicobacter pylori”, “Campylobacter pylori”, “Obesity”, “Hypoventilation Syndrome”, “Obesity-Hypoventilation Syndrome”, “Abdominal Obesities”, “Central Obesity”, “Visceral Obesity”, “Benign Obesity Metabolically Healthy Obesity”, “Metabolically Benign Obesity”, “Healthy Obesity”, “Severe Obesities”, “Morbid Obesity”, “Body Mass Index”, “Overweight”, and “Quetelets Index”. After removing duplicated articles from the primary search results, two independent reviewers (SN and AB) screened the title and abstract of the remaining articles and eliminated the irrelevant ones. Any disagreement between them was discussed and if no consensus was achieved, the conflict was resolved by the third researcher (YM). The PRISMA flowchart of this study was shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The flow diagram of the literature search and study selection

Full size image

Eligibility criteria

The articles met the following criteria, were included in this systematic review: (1) case–control studies, (2) human populations, (3) study populations were patients with BMI ≥ 25, and (4) Helicobacter pylori infection was an independent variable. Besides, the exclusion criteria were case reports, reviews, animal studies, letters to the editor, and cohort studies.

Data extraction

A data extraction form was created based on our group discussion according to 10 different types of the study. Then, it was modified and used by the data extractors. Two researchers (AB and SN) independently extracted and entered data into the modified extraction form. Any disagreement was assessed by both and if a consensus was not reached, a third researcher (YM) would make a decision. The following information was extracted from the included studies: 1) the name of the first author, 2) the date of publication, 3) the country, 4) control subjects, 5) study populations, 6) the age, 7) the mean of BMI, 8) measurement of association, 11) controlled variables, and 12) the method of bacteria detection.

Quality assessment or risk of bias

All studies were assessed by the Modified Newcastle–Ottawa Scale for case–control studies [24]. Using this tool, each study was judged in terms of eight items, and categorized into three groups: the selection of the study groups; the comparability of the groups; and how to measure exposure and the desired outcome in the selected case–control studies [25]. Two researchers (YM and AB) independently evaluated the quality of included studies and the results were reported in Table 1.

Table 1 The main characteristics of case–control studies on the effect of H. pylori infection on the risk of obesity and vice versa
Full size table

Statistical analysis

The logarithm and standard error logarithm odds ratio (OR) were used for the meta-analysis. The DerSimonian and Laird method was used to compute the pooled estimate of odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) [12]. Because the test for heterogeneity was statistically significant in some analyses, the random effect models were used to estimate the OR. In this study, the w Cochran’s Q test and I2 statistic were used to evaluate statistical heterogeneity between studies [13]. Besides, a meta-regression and subgroup analysis were performed to assess the source of heterogeneity between studies. Moreover, publication bias was assessed by the funnel plot and Egger and Begg’s test [14, 15]. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA 16.0 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA).

Results

Study selection and characteristics

Our search strategy yielded a total of 1599 possibly relevant articles after the removal of the duplicate ones. Through screening the title and abstract of the retrieved articles, 1478 ones were excluded due to irrelevancy and the remaining 121 articles were reviewed in the full-text for eligibility assessment. Finally, 8 case–control studies [11, 12, 26,27,28,29,30,31] were selected for meta-analysis by passing the inclusion and exclusion criteria filters (Fig. 1). The general characteristics of the included studies were demonstrated in Table 1. In total, 25,519 participants aged between 24 and 46 years, were included in our meta-analysis. Four studies with 22,830 participants evaluated the impact of obesity on the risk of H. pylori infection while the other four studies with 2689 participants evaluated the effect of H. pylori on the development of obesity. These studies were carried out in different geographical populations consisted of Saudi Arabia, Mexico, Taiwan, Turkey, China, Pakistan, and the USA, between 2004 and 2018. In addition, various techniques were employed to detect the H. pylori infection, including the histology or biopsy (n = 4 studies), 13C-urea breath test (n = 2 studies), ELISA (n = 2 studies), H. pylori stool antigen test (n = 1 study), and one step H. pylori test device (n = 1 study).

The effect of obesity on the development of H. pylori

The odds ratio of studies evaluating the effect of obesity on the risk of H. pylori infection ranged between 0.50 (95% CI: 0.39, 0.65) and 2.91 (95% CI: 2.01, 4.21); the pooled analysis of these studies revealed that the risk of H. pylori infection was higher in obese participants than that in lean participants with an odds ratio of 1.56 (95% CI: 1.09, 3.65) and there was low heterogeneity between these studies in estimating the effect of obesity on the risk of H. pylori infection (I-squared = 58.03%, p = 0.04) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

The effect of obesity on the risk of Helicobacter pylori infection

Full size image

The effect of H. pylori on the development of obesity

The results showed that if the status of both H. pylori and Cag A Antibody were positive, there was a significant relationship between the presence of H. pylori infection and the occurrence of obesity (OR:1.18; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.35) (Fig. 3). However, in the presence of the positive status of H. pylori and the negative status of Cag A Antibody, the effect of H. pylori infection on the occurrence of obesity was 1.02 (95% CI: 0.84, 1.20), which was not statistically significant (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

The effect of Helicobacter pylori infection on the risk of obesity

Full size image

Subgroup analysis of the pooled effect of H. pylori infection on obesity

The subgroup analysis based on the method of diagnosis, would be demonstrated if ELIZA was employed to detect the H. pylori infection. The pooled odds ratio of H. pylori infection on the risk of obesity development was 1.11 (95% CI: 0.99 – 1.25) while the odds ratios of the histology/biopsy technique and 13C-urea breath test were 0.88 (95% CI: 0.45 – 1.72) and 1.01 (95% CI: 1.00 – 1.02), respectively. By the way, four studies utilized ELIZA to detect H. pylori infection among the participants and there was no heterogeneity between the results of these studies (I-squared = 0.0%, p = 0.627) (Table 2).

Table 2 Subgroup analysis of the pooled effect of obesity on H. pylori infection and vice versa based on the diagnosis method
Full size table

Subgroup analysis of the pooled effect of obesity on H. pylori infection

On the other hand, the subgroup analysis of the pooled effect of obesity on the risk of H. pylori infection based on the method of diagnosis, revealed that in three studies that had utilized the histology/biopsy approach, obesity didn’t significantly increase the odds of H. pylori infection (odds ratio = 1.14; 95% CI: 0.96 – 1.36) while in other diagnostic methods, e.g. the 13C-urea breath test and one step H. pylori test device, obesity increased the odds of H. pylori infection with an odds ratios of 2.11 (95% CI: 1.48 – 2.99) and 2.91 (95% CI: 2.01 – 4.20), respectively. However, it is noteworthy that there was low heterogeneity between studies estimating the effect of obesity on H. pylori infection through the histology/biopsy approach (I-squared = 60.0%, p = 0.145) (Table 2).

Publication bias

Because zero was not in the 95% confidence interval of the Egger’s test, significant bias occurred in the publication of the results related to the effect of obesity on the risk of H. pylori infection (Egger’s test = 4.10, P = 0.003, 95% CI: 2.68 to 5.52). The funnel plot of the pooled effect of obesity on the risk of H. pylori infection was shown in Fig. 4(A). Also no significant bias occurred in the publication of the results of the H. pylori effect on the development of obesity (Egger’s test = 0.437, P = 0.265, 95% CI: -0.50 to 1.37). The funnel plot of the pooled effect of H. pylori on the development of obesity was shown in Fig. 4(B).

Fig. 4
figure 4

The funnel plot of the obesity effect on the risk of Helicobacter pylori infection (A) and the effect of Helicobacter pylori on obesity (B)

Full size image

Discussion

This study was the first meta-analysis investigating the correlation between H. pylori infection and obesity worldwide. The pooled analysis of 8 case–control studies demonstrated that the H. pylori prevalence in the obese population was higher than that in the normal population and also, H. pylori positive individuals were more likely to be obese than H. pylori negative individuals. Therefore, there was a positive correlation between the prevalence of obesity and the risk of H. pylori infection around the world.

The underlying mechanisms of these results are not well-recognized; however, some potential pathways explain these findings. First, regulation of the gastric hormones (e.g. ghrelin and leptin) deals with the energy hemostasis [32]. The ghrelin secretion by P/D1 cells of stomach in hunger status increases appetite and induces food intake while the leptin secretion by P cells of stomach and adipocytes following food intake, decreases appetite and induces satiety [33, 34]. H. pylori positive individuals have lower plasma levels of ghrelin and leptin than non-infected individuals. Therefore, lower serum leptin delays the feeling of satiety during eating and leads to more energy intake and develops obesity. Meanwhile, the lower serum ghrelin in H. pylori-infected patients indicates lower production of this hormone due to atrophic gastritis as well as the physiological response of the body to positive energy balance in the obese population [35,36,37]. In addition, it is revealed that the cure of H. pylori infection increases the serum ghrelin level [38]. The second potential factor that explains the positive relationship between the risk of obesity and H. pylori infection is the higher insulin resistance in H. pylori positive patients, that leads to obesity development [39]. The third factor that potentially interferes with our findings, is the impairment of the immune function of the gastrointestinal tract among the obese population. Accordingly, the monocytes of the immune system have a low ability of maturation into macrophages [40,41,42] and also, the natural killer cells of obese individuals have less cytotoxic activity than those of healthy-BMI individuals, that both result in less bactericidal activity, higher susceptibility of H. pylori survival and the higher prevalence of H. pylori infection in obese subjects [43].

The meta-analysis by Xu et al. [44] in 2019 revealed that H. pylori infection increased the risk of obesity development among the Chinese population with an odds ratio of 1.20 (95% CI: 1.13 to 1.28). This relationship was congruent with our findings. It has been also reported that H. pylori positive patients had higher total cholesterol, triglyceride, and LDL levels and a lower HDL level [44].

In this meta-analysis, the results showed that the effect of Helicobacter pylori infection on the occurrence of obesity after a combination of studies controlling confounding variables was 1.01 with a confidence interval of 1.01 to 1.03. It could be argued that there was almost no association between the presence of infection and the occurrence of obesity because the size of the association was not very significant. Based on the diagnosis method of Helicobacter pylori infection, the results showed that, after combining the results of studies which had used the ELIZA method to detect bacteria, the effect size was 1.11 with a confidence interval of 0.99 to 1.25, indicating that people with infection were 11% more obese than people who did not have an infection. This relationship was close to a significant level. In this subgroup analysis, the heterogeneity rate in all was close to 0%, which indicated the absence of heterogeneity in these analyzes and studies. In determining the relationship between obesity and the incidence of Helicobacter pylori infection, after combining the results of case studies that diagnosed the infection using the histology and biopsy, the odds ratio was 1.14, but was not statistically significant and the amount of heterogeneity decreased relative to the overall findings. This indicated that different diagnostic methods to determine the association between obesity and infection were a major source of heterogeneity and its creation in the overall combination of studies.

Limitations

One of the limitations of this study was the limited number of articles that did not allow the investigation of the relationship based on important variables. In addition, the most important limitation of this study was the lack of isolation of Helicobacter pylori genotypes in meta-analysis studies. Also, the type of Helicobacter pylori strains was not specified in the studies. For example, Helicobacter pylori type I is more involved in the occurrence of metabolic disorders than the type II. If these cases were identified, the authors could perform subgroup analysis in this study based on these variables and could compare the effects. Obesity is also a disorder that is strongly influenced by the lifestyle and genetic or hereditary factors. It is suitable to conduct a more detailed study in the future in the form of cohort studies with an appropriate sample size in order to determine this effect by precisely controlling the confounding variables.

Conclusion

The prevalence of H. pylori infection in obese individuals was higher than that in the healthy-BMI population and also the risk of obesity development in H. pylori-positive patients was higher than that in non-infected participants.

Availability of data and materials

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its supporting information files.

References

  1. Pi-Sunyer FX. The medical risks of obesity. Obes Surg. 2002;12(1):S6–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abúndez CO, Cázares GN, Cordero CJFR, Zetina DAD, Angona SR, de Voghel Gutiérrez S, et al. Encuesta nacional de salud y nutrición 2006. Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública. 2006.

  3. Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C. Rising burden of obesity in Asia . J Obesity. 2010;2010:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Collaboration APCS. The burden of overweight and obesity in the Asia-Pacific region. Obes Rev. 2007;8(3):191–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hegde V, Dhurandhar N. Microbes and obesity—interrelationship between infection, adipose tissue and the immune system. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19(4):314–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. DiBaise JK, Zhang H, Crowell MD, Krajmalnik-Brown R, Decker GA, Rittmann BE, editors. Gut microbiota and its possible relationship with obesity. Mayo clinic proceedings; 2008: Elsevier.

  7. Xu M-Y, Liu L, Yuan B-S, Yin J, Lu Q-B. Association of obesity with Helicobacter pylori infection: a retrospective study. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23(15):2750.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Xu X, Li W, Qin L, Yang W, Yu G, Wei Q. Relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection and obesity in Chinese adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019;14(9):e0221076.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Hooi JK, Lai WY, Ng WK, Suen MM, Underwood FE, Tanyingoh D, et al. Global prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2017;153(2):420–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kyriazanos ID, Sfiniadakis I, Gizaris V, Hountis P, Hatziveis K, Dafnopoulou A, et al. The incidence of Helicobacter pylori infection is not increased among obese young individuals in Greece. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2002;34(5):541–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu M-S, Lee W-J, Wang H-H, Huang S-P, Lin J-T. A case-control study of association of Helicobacter pylori infection with morbid obesity in Taiwan. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(13):1552–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Arslan E, Atılgan H, Yavaşoğlu İ. The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in obese subjects. Eur J Intern Med. 2009;20(7):695–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kuipers E. Helicobacter pylori and the risk and management of associated diseases: gastritis, ulcer disease, atrophic gastritis and gastric cancer. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1997;11(S1):71–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim SS, Ruiz VE, Carroll JD, Moss SF. Helicobacter pylori in the pathogenesis of gastric cancer and gastric lymphoma. Cancer Lett. 2011;305(2):228–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Smolka AJ, Backert S. How Helicobacter pylori infection controls gastric acid secretion. J Gastroenterol. 2012;47(6):609–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Den Hollander WJ, Broer L, Schurmann C, Meyre D, Den Hoed CM, Mayerle J, et al. Helicobacter pylori colonization and obesity–a Mendelian randomization study. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):14467.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang Y, Du T, Chen X, Yu X, Tu L, Zhang C. Association between Helicobacter pylori infection and overweight or obesity in a Chinese population. The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries. 2015;9(09):945–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Suki M, Leibovici Weissman Y, Boltin D, Itskoviz D, Tsadok Perets T, Comaneshter D, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection is positively associated with an increased BMI, irrespective of socioeconomic status and other confounders: a cohort study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;30(2):143–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lender N, Talley N, Enck P, Haag S, Zipfel S, Morrison M, et al. associations between H elicobacter pylori and obesity-an ecological study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014;40(1):24–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen TP, Hung HF, Chen MK, Lai HH, Hsu WF, Huang KC, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection is positively associated with metabolic syndrome in Taiwanese adults: a cross-sectional study. Helicobacter. 2015;20(3):184–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu C-H, Chao W-T, Lin S-C, Lau H-Y, Wu H-H, Wang P-H. Malignant perivascular epithelioid cell tumor in the female genital tract: preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Medicine. 2019;98(2):e14072.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. 2010.

  24. Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Deeks J, Dinnes J, D’Amico R, Sowden A, Sakarovitch C, Song F, et al. Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(27):iii–x 1-173.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Al-Zubaidi AM, Alzobydi AH, Alsareii SA, Al-Shahrani A, Alzaman N, Kassim S. Body mass index and Helicobacter pylori among obese and non-obese patients in Najran, Saudi Arabia: a case-control study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(11):2586.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Cho I, Blaser MJ, François F, Mathew JP, Ye XY, Goldberg JD, et al. Helicobacter pylori and overweight status in the United States: data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;162(6):579–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ioannou G, Weiss N, Kearney D. Is Helicobacter pylori seropositivity related to body mass index in the United States? Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005;21(6):765–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Méndez-Sánchez N, Pichardo-Bahena R, Vásquez-Fernández F, Lezama-Mora JI, León-Canales AL, Barredo-Prieto B, et al. Effect of Helicobacter pylori infection on gastric ghrelin expression and body weight. Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2007;72(4):359–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Siddiqui B, Yakoob J, Abbas Z, Azmat R, Fatima SS, Awan S. Distribution of Helicobacter pylori infection and abnormal body-mass index (BMI) in a developing country. The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries. 2018;12(05):342–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Xu C, Yan M, Sun Y, Joo J, Wan X, Yu C, et al. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection and its relation with body mass index in a Chinese population. Helicobacter. 2014;19(6):437–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Klok M, Jakobsdottir S, Drent M. The role of leptin and ghrelin in the regulation of food intake and body weight in humans: a review. Obes Rev. 2007;8(1):21–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ahima RS, Flier JS. Leptin. Annu Rev Physiol. 2000;62(1):413–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bado A, Levasseur S, Attoub S, Kermorgant S, Laigneau J-P, Bortoluzzi M-N, et al. The stomach is a source of leptin. Nature. 1998;394(6695):790.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Roper J, Francois F, Shue PL, Mourad MS, Pei Z, Olivares de Perez AZ, et al. Leptin and ghrelin in relation to Helicobacter pylori status in adult males. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(6):2350–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Osawa H, Nakazato M, Date Y, Kita H, Ohnishi H, Ueno H, et al. Impaired production of gastric ghrelin in chronic gastritis associated with Helicobacter pylori. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(1):10–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tschöp M, Weyer C, Tataranni PA, Devanarayan V, Ravussin E, Heiman ML. Circulating ghrelin levels are decreased in human obesity. Diabetes. 2001;50(4):707–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Nwokolo C, Freshwater D, O’hare P, Randeva H. Plasma ghrelin following cure of Helicobacter pylori. Gut. 2003;52(5):637–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Gunji T, Matsuhashi N, Sato H, Fujibayashi K, Okumura M, Sasabe N, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection significantly increases insulin resistance in the asymptomatic Japanese population. Helicobacter. 2009;14(5):496–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Marti A, Marcos A, Martinez JA. Obesity and immune function relationships. Obes Rev. 2001;2(2):131–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Krishnan EC, Trost L, Aarons S, Jewell WR. Study of function and maturation of monocytes in morbidly obese individuals. J Surg Res. 1982;33(2):89–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Palmblad J, Hallberg D, Engstedt L. Polymorphonuclear (PMN) function after small intestinal shunt operation for morbid obesity. Br J Haematol. 1980;44(1):101–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Moulin CM, Marguti I, Peron JPS, Rizzo LV, Halpern A. Impact of adiposity on immunological parameters. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2009;53(2):183–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Xu X, Li W, Qin L, Yang W, Yu G, Wei Q. Relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection and obesity in Chinese adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis. PloS one. 2019;14(9):e0221076.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

No.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Endocrine Research Center, Institute of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Ali Baradaran

  2. Students Scientific Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Hojat Dehghanbanadaki

  3. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Sara Naderpour

  4. Clinical Research Development Center, Imam Reza Hospital, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran

    Leila Mohammadi Pirkashani

  5. Department of Health Management and Social Development Research Center, Faculty of Health, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran

    Abdolhalim Rajabi

  6. Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, 66179-13446, Iran

    Roya Rashti & Yousef Moradi

  7. Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Sevda Riahifar

Authors
  1. Ali Baradaran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hojat Dehghanbanadaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sara Naderpour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Leila Mohammadi Pirkashani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Abdolhalim Rajabi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Roya Rashti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sevda Riahifar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yousef Moradi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: Yousef M and Ali B. Data curation: Yousef M, Sara N, and Ali B. Formal analysis: Yousef M. Funding acquisition: Hojat D, Ali B, Abdolhalim R, and Leila MP. Methodology: Yousef M, and Abdolhalim R. Project administration: Yousef M. Software: Yousef M, and Ali B. Supervision: Yousef M. Validation: Yousef M. Writing – original draft: Hojat D, Sara N, Abdolhalim R, SR and Leila MP. Writing – review & editing: Yousef M, and Ali B. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yousef Moradi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baradaran, A., Dehghanbanadaki, H., Naderpour, S. et al. The association between Helicobacter pylori and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of case–control studies. Clin Diabetes Endocrinol 7, 15 (2021). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s40842-021-00131-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s40842-021-00131-w

Keywords

Clinical Diabetes and Endocrinology

ISSN: 2055-8260

Contact us